4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages 165-170

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.002

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Proficiency-based curricula, using both virtual reality (VR) and videotrainer (VT) simulators have proven to be efficient and, maximally effective, but little is known about the retention of acquired skills. The purpose of this study was to assess skill retention after completion of a validated laparoscopic skills curriculum. Methods. Surgery residents (n = 14) with no previous VR or VT experience were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol and sequentially practiced 12 Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-VR and 5 VT tasks until proficiency levels were achieved. One VR (manipulate diathermy) and I VT (bean drop) tasks were selected for assessment at baseline, after training completion (posttest), and at retention. Results. All residents completed the curriculum. Posttest assessment occurred at 13.2 +/- 11.8 days and retention assessment at 7.0 +/- 4.0 months. After an early performance decrement at posttest (17%-45%), the acquired skill was maintained up to the end of the follow-up Period. For W scores were 81.5 +/- 23.5 at baseline, 33.3 +/- 1.8 at prificiency, 48.4 +/- 9.2 at posttest, and 48.4 11.8 at retention. For VT, scores were 49.4 +/- 12.5 at baseline, 22.0 +/- 1.4 at proficiency, 25.6 +/- 3.6 at posttest, and 26.4 +/- 4.2 at retention. Skill retention was better for VT, compared with VR (P <.02). The extent of skill deterioration did not correlate with training duration or resident level. Conclusions. Although residents do not retain all acquired skills (more so for VR than for VT) according to simulator assessment, proficiency-based training on simulators results in durable skills. Additional studies are warranted to further optimize curriculum design, investigate simulator differences, and establish training methods that improve skill retention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available