4.5 Article

Temperature-dependence of metabolic rate in Glossina morsitans morsitans (Diptera, Glossinidae) does not vary with gender, age, feeding, pregnancy or acclimation

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 8, Pages 861-870

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.03.017

Keywords

metabolic cold adaptation; Q(10) effect; evolutionary trade-off; universal temperature dependence; within-generation plasticity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While variation in metabolic rate at a single temperature can occur for a variety of reasons and the effect of temperature is well established in insects, within-generation variation of metabolic rate-temperature relationships has been relatively poorly explored. In this study, we investigate the effects of gender, age, feeding and pregnancy, as well as three acclimation temperatures (19, 24, 29 degrees C), on standard metabolic rate and its temperature-dependence within post-developmental (i.e. non-teneral) adult G. morsitans morsitans. Although most of the independent variables influenced metabolic rate at a single test temperature (P < 0.001 in most cases), and cold-acclimation resulted in significant up-regulation of metabolic rate at all test temperatures relative to 24 and 29 degrees C acclimation (P < 0.0001), mass-independent metabolic rate-temperature relationships were surprisingly invariant over all experimental groups (P > 0.05 in all cases). Slopes of log(10) metabolic rate (ml CO2 h(-1)) against temperature (degrees C) ranged from a minimum of 0.03035 (+/- S.E. = 0.003) in young fasted females to a maximum of 0.03834 (+/- 0.004) in mature fasted males. These findings have implications for predicting the metabolic responses of tsetse flies to short-term temperature variation and may also have applications for modelling tsetse population dynamics as a function of temperature. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available