4.7 Article

Fractionation of N2O isotopomers during production by denitrifier

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages 1535-1545

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.01.009

Keywords

nitrous oxide (N2O); denitrification; isotopomers; N-15-site preference; denitifying bacteria; isotopic fractionation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isotopomer ratios of N2O, which include intramolecular N-15-site preference in addition to conventional isotope ratios for N and O in NNO (we designate N-alpha and N-beta for the center and end N atom, respectively, in the asymmetric molecule), reflect production and consumption processes of this greenhouse gas. Therefore, they are useful parameters for deducing global N2O budget. This paper reports the first precise measurement of N-15-site preference in N2O produced by two species of denitrifying bacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens (ATCC 13525) and Paracoccus denitrificans (ATCC 17741). Cultures were incubated in a batch mode with a liquid medium that contains KNO3 as unique nitrogen supply under acetylene/helium (10% v/v) atmosphere at 27 degrees C. Enrichment factors for N-15 in bulk nitrogen in N2O (average for N-alpha and N-beta) fluctuated in a few tens permil showing a slight difference between the species. In contrast, N-15-site preference (difference in isotope ratios between N-alpha and N-beta) showed nearly constant and distinct value for the two species (23.3 +/- 4.2 and -5.1 +/- 1.8 parts per thousand for P. fluorescens and P. denitrificans, respectively). The site preference was also measured for N2O produced by inorganic reactions (nitrite reduction and hydroxylamine oxidation); a unique value (about 30 parts per thousand for the both reactions) was obtained. These results and those recently reported for nitrifying bacteria suggest that N-15-site preference in N2O can be used to identify the production processes of N2O on the level of bacterial species or enzymes involved. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available