4.7 Review

Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors in experimental ischemic stroke and their effects on infarct size and cerebral blood flow: A systematic review

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 412-425

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.03.028

Keywords

nitric oxide; nitric oxide synthase inhibitor; nitric oxide synthase; ischemic stroke; animal; free radicals

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 29226] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric oxide produced by the neuronal or inducible isoform of nitric oxide synthase (nNOS, iNOS) is detrimental in acute ischemic stroke (IS), whereas that derived from the endothelial isoform is beneficial. However, experimental studies with nitric oxide synthase inhibitors have given conflicting results. Relevant studies were found from searches of EMBASE, PubMed, and reference lists; of 456 references found, 73 studies involving 2321 animals were included. Data on the effects of NOS inhibition on lesion volume (mm(3), %) and cerebral blood flow (CBF; %, ml center dot min(-1) center dot g(-1)) were analyzed using the Cochrane Review Manager software. NOS inhibitors reduced total infarct volume in models of permanent (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.56, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.86, -0.26) and transient (SMD -0.99, 95% CI -1.25, -0.72) ischemia. Cortical CBF was reduced in models of permanent but not transient ischemia. When assessed by type of inhibitor, total lesion volume was reduced in permanent models by nNOS and iNOS inhibitors, but not by nonselective inhibitors. All types of NOS inhibitors reduced infarct volume in transient models. NOS inhibition may have negative effects on CBF but further studies are required. Selective nNOS and NOS inhibitors are candidate treatments for acute IS. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available