4.6 Article

Democracy in action: Quantization, saturation, and compressive sensing

Journal

APPLIED AND COMPUTATIONAL HARMONIC ANALYSIS
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 429-443

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.acha.2011.02.002

Keywords

Compressive sensing; Quantization; Saturation; Consistent reconstruction

Funding

  1. NSF [CCF-0431150, CCF-0728867, CCF-0926127, CNS-0435425, CNS-0520280, DMS-1004718]
  2. DARPA/ONR [N66001-08-1-2065, ONR N00014-07-1-0936, N00014-08-1-1067, N00014-08-1-1112, N00014-08-1-1066]
  3. AFOSR [FA9550-07-1-0301, FA9550-09-1-0432]
  4. ARO MURI [W911NF-07-1-0185, W911NF-09-1-0383]
  5. Texas Instruments Leadership University
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0926127] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1004718] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [0926127] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent theoretical developments in the area of compressive sensing (CS) have the potential to significantly extend the capabilities of digital data acquisition systems such as analog-to-digital converters and digital imagers in certain applications. To date, most of the CS literature has been devoted to studying the recovery of sparse signals from a small number of linear measurements. In this paper, we study more practical CS systems where the measurements are quantized to a finite number of bits; in such systems some of the measurements typically saturate, causing significant nonlinearity and potentially unbounded errors. We develop two general approaches to sparse signal recovery in the face of saturation error. The first approach merely rejects saturated measurements; the second approach factors them into a conventional CS recovery algorithm via convex consistency constraints. To prove that both approaches are capable of stable signal recovery, we exploit the heretofore relatively unexplored property that many CS measurement systems are democratic, in that each measurement carries roughly the same amount of information about the signal being acquired. A series of computational experiments indicate that the signal acquisition error is minimized when a significant fraction of the CS measurements is allowed to saturate (10-30% in our experiments). This challenges the conventional wisdom of both conventional sampling and (C). 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available