4.7 Article

Neighborhood size effects on mortality, growth and crown morphology of paper birch

Journal

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 214, Issue 1-3, Pages 251-265

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.04.009

Keywords

neighborhood; competition; zone of perception; manual cutting; triclopyr

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neighborhood removal treatments are commonly used to increase forest tree productivity, but it is unknown if they correspond with target zone of perception or if they differentially affect mortality, growth and crown morphology. In 12-13-year-old stands, naturally regenerated paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) was removed in neighborhoods 1 m, 2 m, 3 m, and 4 m in radius using three methods (single cutting, double cutting, or triclopyr). Zone of neighbor perception for target birch ranged between 0.9 and 4 m, depending on the response variable. The birch-free radius where neighbors started to reduce target performance was 3-4 m for diameter increment and 2-3 m for crown size. Crown diameter was reduced in 1 m smaller radii than where height-to-live crown was increased. Self-thinning occurred in 0.9-1.3 m spaced controls, but target mortality was not reduced with increased birch-free radius. Triclopyr killed most treated birch in all radii within I year, and also many target trees because of inter-tree chemical transfer through roots and soil. Most cut birch sprouted, but sprout mortality increased and height decreased with decreasing radius. A critical radius of 2-3 m resulted in increased target diameter growth while still restricting crown expansion and suppressing neighbor sprouting. These results highlight the need to recognize variation in zone of perception for different response variables when evaluating competitive effects or designing removal treatments. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available