4.7 Article

Effects of signal processing on the measurement of maximum sound pressure levels

Journal

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 11-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.09.017

Keywords

Maximum sound pressure level; Signal processing; Sound level meter; Transient; Impulse

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. University of Liverpool

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maximum sound pressure levels are commonly used for environmental noise and building acoustics measurements. This paper investigates the signal processing errors due to Fast or Slow time-weighting detectors when combined with octave band filters, one-third octave band filters or an A-weighting filter. For 6th order Butterworth CPB filters the inherent time delay caused by the phase response of filters is quantified using three different approaches to establish the following rules-of-thumb: (1) time-to-gradient/amplitude matching occurs when Bt approximate to 1, (2) time-to-peak matching occurs when Bt approximate to 2 and (3) time-to-settle matching occurs when Bt approximate to 4 for octave band filters, and when Bt approximate to 3 for one-third octave band filters. Four different commercially-available sound level meters are used to quantify the variation in measured maximum levels using tone bursts, half-sine pulses, ramped noise and recorded transients. Tone bursts indicate that Slow time-weighting is inappropriate for maximum level measurements due to the large bias error. The results also show that there is more variation between sound level meters when considering Fast time-weighted maximum levels in octave bands or one-third octave bands than with A-weighted levels. To reduce the variation between measurements with different sound level meters, it is proposed that limits could be prescribed on the phase response for CPB filters and A-weighting filters. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available