4.8 Article

The roles of the residues on the channel β-hairpin and loop structures of simian virus 40 hexameric helicase

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409646102

Keywords

AAA(+); molecular machine; replication; large T antigen

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI055926, AI055926] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Simian virus 40 large tumor antigen is required for DNA unwinding during viral replication. The helicase-active form of large tumor antigen is a ring-shaped hexamer/clouble hexamer, which has a positively charged hexameric channel for interacting with DNA. On the hexameric channel surface are six beta-hairpin structures and loops, emanating from each of the six subunits. At the tips of the P-hairpin and the loop structures are two ring-shaped residues, H513 and F459, respectively. Additionally, two positively charged residues, K512 and K516, are near the tip of the beta-hairpin. The positions of these ring-shaped and positively charged residues suggest that they may play a role in binding DNA for helicase function. To understand the roles of these residues in helicase function, we obtained a set of mutants and examined various activities, including oligomerization, ATPase, DNA binding, and helicase activities. We found that substitution of these residues by Ala abolished helicase activity. Extensive mutagenesis showed that substitutions by ring-shaped residues (W and Y) at position F459 and by residues with hydrophobic or long aliphatic side chains (W, Y, F, L, M, and R) at position H513 supported helicase activity. Our study demonstrated that the four residues (F459, H513, K512, and K516) play a critical role in interacting with DNA for helicase function. The results suggest a possible mechanism to explain how these residues, as well as the beta-hairpin and the loop structures on which the residues reside, participate in binding and translocating DNA for origin melting and unwinding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available