4.7 Article

Secular evolution of galactic discs: constraints on phase-space density

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 361, Issue 3, Pages 997-1004

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09240.x

Keywords

Galaxy : evolution; Galaxy : structure; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been argued in the past that bulges of galaxies could not be formed through collisionless secular evolution because that would violate constraints on the phase-space density: the phase-space density in bulges is several times larger than in the inner parts of discs. We show that these arguments against secular evolution are incorrect. Observations give estimates of the coarsely grained phase-space densities of galaxies, f' = rho(s)/sigma(R)sigma(phi)sigma(z), where rho(s) is the stellar density and sigma(R), sigma(phi) and sigma(z) are the radial, tangential and vertical rms velocities of stars, respectively. Using high-resolutionN-body simulations, we study the evolution of fin stellar discs of Galaxy-size models. During the secular evolution, the discs, which are embedded in live cold dark matter haloes, form a bar and then a thick, dynamically hot, central mass concentration. During the course of evolution f' declines at all radii. However, the decline is different in different parts of the disc. In the inner disc, f'(R) develops a valley with a minimum around the end of the central mass concentration. The final result is that the values of f' in the central regions are significantly larger than those in the inner disc. The minimum, which becomes deeper with time, seems to be due to a large phase mixing produced by the outer bar. We find that the shape and the amplitude of f'(R) for different simulations agree qualitatively with the observed f'(R) in our Galaxy. Curiously enough, the fact that the coarsely grained phase-space density of the bulge is significantly larger than that of the inner disc turns out to be an argument in favour of secular formation of bulges, not against it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available