4.7 Article

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) blood DNA load, CMV retinitis progression, and occurrence of resistant CMV in patients with CMV retinitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 192, Issue 4, Pages 640-649

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/432012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR00052] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [EY-15643, EY-10268] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The amount of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in the blood ( CMV load) may be a marker for detection of resistant CMV. Methods. A total of 165 patients with AIDS and CMV retinitis had CMV load measurements ( plasma and leukocyte) and cultures performed every 3 months; these measurements were correlated with CMV resistance to antiviral drugs and CMV retinitis progression ( from masked readings of retinal photographs). Results. Detectable plasma and leukocyte CMV loads were associated with CMV retinitis progression ( odds ratios [OR], 6.3; and OR, 6.6;, respectively), phenotypic resistance ( OR, 6.1; and OR, P < .0001 P < .0001 P < .0001 23.4;, respectively), and genotypic resistance ( OR, 17.5; and OR, 51.6;, respectively). P < .0002 P < .0001 Pp < 0004 The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of plasma CMV loads were 0.47, 0.86, 0.36, and 0.91, respectively, for progression and 0.59, 0.81, 0.07, and 0.99, respectively, for resistance; those of leukocyte CMV loads were 0.52, 0.83, 0.35, and 0.91, respectively, for progression and 0.82, 0.78, 0.08, and 0.99, respectively, for resistance. A detectable plasma CMV load at the time of diagnosis of CMV retinitis was associated with mortality ( median survival time, 13.6 vs. 29.7 months;). P = .007 Conclusions. CMV load has limited clinical utility, because of its low positive predictive value. Its high negative predictive value for occurrence of resistant CMV suggests that it may have utility as a screening tool to exclude resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available