4.3 Article

Increasing the molecular contacts between maurotoxin and Kv1.2 channel augments ligand affinity

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 401-411

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20509

Keywords

maurotoxin; butantoxin; scorpion toxin; chimera toxin; K+ channels; molecular; contacts; toxin affinity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scorpion toxins interact with their target ion channels through multiple molecular contacts. Because a gain of function approach has never been described to evaluate the importance of the molecular contacts in defining toxin affinity, we experimentally examined whether increasing the molecular contacts between a toxin and an ion channel directly impacts toxin affinity. For this purpose, we focused on two scorpion peptides, the well-characterized maurotoxin with its variant Pi-like disulfide bridging (MTXPi1), used as a molecular template, and butantoxin (BuTX), used as an N-terminal domain provider. BuTX is found to be 60-fold less potent than MTXPi1 in blocking Kv1.2 (IC50 values of 165 nM for BuTX versus 2.8 nM for MTXPi1). Removal of its N-terminal domain (nine residues) further decreases BuTX affinity for Kv1.2 by 5.6-fold, which is in agreement with docking simulation data showing the importance of this domain in BuTX-Kv1.2 interaction. Transfer of the BuTX N-terminal domain to MTXPi1 results in a chimera with five disulfide bridges (BuTX-MTXPi1) that exhibits 22-fold greater affinity for Kv1.2 than MTXPi1 itself, in spite of the lower affinity of BuTX as compared to MTXPi1. Docking experiments performed with the 3-D structure of BuTX-MTXPi1 in solution, as solved by 'H-NMR, reveal that the N-terminal domain of BuTX participates in the increased affinity for Kv1.2 through additional molecular contacts. Altogether, the data indicate that acting on molecular contacts between a toxin and a channel is an efficient strategy to modulate toxin affinity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available