4.6 Article

Expression and function of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family ligands and their receptors on human immune cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue 4, Pages 2301-2308

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.4.2301

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is increasing evidence that factors originally identified due to their neurotrophic activity also function within the immune system. This study focused on the related molecules glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and neurturin (NTN) as well as their receptors. GDNF and NTN signaling is mediated by a two-component receptor: a signal-transducing component, RET, which is shared by both ligands, and a ligand-specific binding component, GFR alpha-1 (higher GDNF affinity) or GFR alpha-2 (higher NTN affinity). We report that human T cells, B cells, and monocytes produce NTN but not GDNF, as seen by RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. RET was expressed by B cells, T cells, and monocytes. Exons 2-5 of RET encoding the cadherin-like domains 1-3 in the extracellular part and exons 16-19 encoding a section of the second tyrosine kinase domain were transcribed in CD4(+) T cells, CD8(+) T cells, B cells, and monocytes. Different splice variants encoding the C-terminal intracellular part (exons 19-21) of RET were detected. The ligand-binding receptors GFR alpha-1 and GFR alpha-2 were transcribed in all immune cell subsets. Quantitative PCR showed that GFR alpha-2 is by far the dominant ligand binding chain in T cells, B cells, and monocytes. Addition of GDNF or NTN to activated PBMCs reduced the amount of detectable TNF protein without altering its transcription. Together, this suggests that immune cells communicate with each other via NTN. Production of NTN by immune cells might also contribute to the neuroprotective immunity in the CNS observed in different model systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available