4.3 Article

Various strategies of using residual dipolar couplings in NMR-driven protein docking:: Application to Lys48-linked Di-ubiquitin and validation against 15N-relaxation data

Journal

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 367-381

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20476

Keywords

protein complexes; chemical shift perturbation; residual dipolar couplings; docking; diffusion anisotropy; di-ubiquitin

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM65334] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When classical, Nuclear Overhauser Effect (NOE)-based approaches fail, it is possible, given high-resolution structures of the free molecules, to model the structure of a complex in solution based solely on chemical shift perturbation (CSP) data in combination with orientational. restraints from residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) when available. RDCs can be incorporated into the docking following various strategies: as direct restraints and/or as intermolecular intervector projection angle restraints (Meiler et al., J Biomol NMR 2000;16:245-252). The advantage of the latter for docking is that they directly define the relative orientation of the molecules. A combined protocol in which RDCs are first introduced as intervector projection angle restraints and at a later stage as direct restraints is shown here to give the best performance. This approach, implemented in our information-driven docking approach HADDOCK (Dominguez et al., J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:17311737), is used to determine the solution structure of the Lys48-linked di-ubiquitin, for which chemical shift mapping, RDCs, and N-15-relaxation data have been previously obtained (Varadan et al., J Mol Biol 2002;324:637-647). The resulting structures, derived from CSP and RDC data, are cross-validated using N-15-relaxation data. The solution structure differs from the crystal structure by a 20 degrees rotation of the two ubiquitin units relative to each other.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available