4.7 Article

Neurocognitive consequences of risk-adapted therapy for childhood medulloblastorna

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages 5511-5519

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.703

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30CA21765, R01CA78957, U01CA81445] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose This prospective, longitudinal study examined the effects of risk-adapted craniospinal irradiation (CSI) dose and the interactions of dose with age and time from diagnosis on intelligence quotient (IQ) and academic achievement (reading, spelling, and math) among patients treated for medulloblastoma (MB). Patients and Methods Patients received serial neurocognitive testing spanning from 0 to 6.03 years after diagnosis (median, 3.14 years). The multi-institutional study included 111 patients, who were 3 to 20 years of age at diagnosis (median age, 7.4 years), treated for IMB with risk-adapted CSI followed by four cycles of high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and vincristine) with stem-cell support. High-risk patients (HR; n = 37) received CSI to 36 to 39.6 Gy and conformal boost treatment of the primary site to 55.8 to 59.4 Gy. Average-risk patients (AR; In = 74) received CSI to 23.4 Gy and conformal boost treatment of the posterior fossa to 36.0 Gy and primary site to 55.8 Gy. Results Multivariate modeling revealed statistically significant declines in mean IQ (-1.59 points/yr; P =.006), reading (-2.95 points/yr; P <.0001), spelling (-2.94 points/yr; P <.0001), and math (-1.87 points/yr; P =.003) scores for the entire group. The effects of risk-adapted radiation therapy on IQ, reading, and spelling were moderated by age, with the greatest rates of decline observed for the HR patients who were younger (< 7 years old) at diagnosis. Conclusion Young age at diagnosis was the most prominent risk factor for neurocognitive deficits among survivors of MB despite reductions in CSI dosing and efforts to limit the boost volume. Younger patients exhibited substantial problems with the development of reading skills.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available