4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages 5542-5551

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.027

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose This randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label, phase III study compared docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer that had progressed after an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 449) were randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) (n = 225) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (n = 224) on day 1, every 21 days until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Results In the intent-to-treat population, both the median overall survival (OS, 15.4 v 12.7 months; hazard ratio [HRI, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.73; P =.03) and the median time to progression (TTP, 5.7 months v 3.6 months; HR, 1.64; 95% Cl, 1.33 to 2.02; P <.0001) for docetaxel were significantly longer than for paclitaxel, and the overall response rate (ORR, 32% v25%; P =.10) was higher for docetaxel. These results were confirmed by multivariate analyses. The incidence of treatment-related hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities was greater for docetaxel than for paclitaxel; however, quality-of-life scores were not statistically different between treatment groups over time. Conclusion Docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel in terms of OS and TTP. ORR was higher for docetaxel. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities occurred more frequently in the docetaxel group. The global quality-of-life scores were similar for both agents over time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available