4.4 Article

Structural basis for cell cycle checkpoint control by the BRCA1-CtIP complex

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 44, Issue 33, Pages 10941-10946

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0509651

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG021964] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK062162] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM065520] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The breast and ovarian tumor suppressor BRCAl has important functions in cell cycle checkpoint control and DNA repair. Two tandem BRCA1 C-terminal (BRCT) domains are essential for the tumor suppression activity of BRCAl and interact in a phosphorylation-dependent manner with proteins involved in DNA damage-induced checkpoint control, including the DNA helicase BACHI and the CtBP-interacting protein (CtIP). The crystal structure of the BRCA1 BRCT repeats bound to the PTRVSpSPVF-GAT phosphopeptide corresponding to residues 322-333 of human CtIP was determined at 2.5 angstrom resolution. The peptide binds to a cleft formed by the interface of the two BRCTs in a two-pronged manner, with phospho-Ser327 and Phe330 anchoring the peptide through extensive contacts with BRCA1 residues. Several hydrogen bonds and salt bridges that stabilize the BRCA1-BACH1 complex are missing in the BRCA1-CtIP interaction, offering a structural basis for the similar to 5-fold lower affinity of BRCA1 for CtIP compared to that of BACH1, as determined by isothermal titration calorimetry. Importantly, the side chain of Arg1775 in the cancer-associated BRCA1 mutation M1775R sterically clashes with the phenyl ring of CtIP Phe330, disrupting the BRCA1-CtIP interaction. These results provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the dynamic selection of target proteins involved in DNA repair and cell cycle control by BRCA1 and reveal how certain cancer-associated mutations affect these interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available