4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

A comparison between intercalation of Li and Mg ions into the model Chevrel phase compound (MxMo6S8):: Impedance spectroscopic studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 146, Issue 1-2, Pages 349-354

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.014

Keywords

electrochemical impedance; Mg-ion intercalation; ion trapping; Gerischer impedance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Comparison between Li and Mg ions insertion into the Chevrel phase M(x)o(6)S(8) (M=Li, Mg) shows interesting features related to the different interactions of the monovalent and the divalant ions with the Mo clusters and the anionic framework. It is clear that Mg ions insertion is much more complicated than Li ions insertion. An attempt was made to explain the peculiar behavior of the impedance spectra related to Mg ions insertion into the Mo6S8 electrode by a recent model for two non-equivalent lattice sites with two different energy barriers, which predicts the so-called Gerischer-type impedance at high frequencies and at the low-frequencies the appearance of additional semicircle, the latter being especially pronounced at the beginning of intercalation. We measure a charge-trapping of the Mg ions in the Chevrel phase at the initial stage of intercalation and at the final stage of deintercalation. An increase in the intercalation level (accompanied by a decrease in potential) correlates with a decrease in the trapping resistance, R-trap. We explain these features of the impedance response of the Mg ions insertion by the peculiar nature of the sites for small ions accommodation in the Chevrel phase structure. The divalent nature of the Mg-ions leads to their slower diffusion compared to the single charge Li ions. In general, the diffusion barrier of the trapped ions decreases with the increase in concentration due to the high electrostatic repulsion among the divalent cations. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available