4.7 Article

Competing pathways determine fibril morphology in the self-assembly of β2-microglobulin into amyloid

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 351, Issue 4, Pages 850-864

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.06.040

Keywords

amyloid fibril; atomic-force microscopy; protein misfolding; protofibril; templated growth

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [SF16972] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [SF16972] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite its importance in biological phenomena, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of amyloid formation remains elusive. Here, we use atomic force microscopy to map the formation of beta(2)-microglobulin amyloid fibrils with distinct morphologies and persistence lengths, when protein concentration, pH and ionic strength are varied. Using the resulting state-diagrams, we demonstrate the existence of two distinct competitive pathways of assembly, which define an energy landscape that rationalises the sensitivity of fibril morphology on the solution conditions. Importantly, we show, that semi-flexible (worm-like) fibrils, which form rapidly during assembly, are kinetically trapped species, formed via a non-nucleated pathway that is explicitly distinct from that leading to the formation of the relatively rigid long-straight fibrils classically associated with amyloid. These semi-flexible fibrils also share an antibody epitope common to other protein oligomers that are known to be toxic species linked to human disease. The. results demonstrate the heterogeneity of amyloid assembly, and have important implications for our understanding of the importance of oligomeric states in,amyloid disease, the origins of prion strains, and the development of therapeutic strategies. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available