4.4 Article

Using multilocus sequence data to define the pneumococcus

Journal

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
Volume 187, Issue 17, Pages 6223-6230

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.187.17.6223-6230.2005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the genetic relationships between serotypeable pneumococci and nonserotypeable presumptive pneumococci using multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and partial sequencing of the pneumolysin gene (ply). Among 121 nonserotypeable presumptive pneumococci from Finland, we identified isolates of three classes: those with sequence types (STs) identical to those of serotypeable pneumococci, suggesting authentic pneumococci in which capsular expression had been downregulated or lost; isolates that clustered among serotypeable pneumococci on a tree based on the concatenated sequences of the MLST loci but which had STs that differed from those of serotypeable pneurnococci in the MLST database; and a more diverse collection of isolates that did not cluster with serotypeable pneumococci. The latter isolates typically had sequences at all seven MLST loci that were 5 to 10% divergent from those of authentic pneumococci and also had distinct and divergent ply alleles. These isolates are proposed to be distinct from pneumococci but cannot be resolved from them by optochin susceptibility, bile solubility, or the presence of the ply gene. Complete resolution of pneumococci from the related but distinct population is problematic, as recombination between them was evident, and a few isolates of each population possessed alleles at one or occasionally more MLST loci from the other population. However, a tree based on the concatenated sequences of the MLST loci in most cases unambiguously distinguished whether a nonserotypeable isolate was or was not a pneumococcus, and the sequence of the ply gene fragment was found to be useful to resolve difficult cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available