4.6 Article

When asking why does not hurt - Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions

Journal

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 709-715

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01600.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH39349] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two experiments examined the psychological operations that enable individuals to process negative emotions and experiences without increasing negative affect. In Study 1, type of self-perspective (self-immersed vs. self-distanced) and type of emotional focus (what vs. why) were experimentally manipulated following the recall of an anger-eliciting interpersonal experience. A why focus on emotions from a self-distanced perspective (distanced-why strategy) was expected to enable cool, reflective processing of emotions, in which individuals can focus on their experience without reactivating excessive hot negative affect. Findings were consistent with this hypothesis. Study 2 replicated these findings and furthermore demonstrated that (a) the degree to which individuals construe their recalled experience in abstract versus concrete terms mediates the effect of the distanced-why strategy and (b) the status of the recalled experience (resolved vs. unresolved) does not moderate the effectiveness of the distanced-why strategy. These findings help disentangle the mechanisms that may allow adaptive working through from those that lead to rumination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available