4.6 Article

The Leiden/Argentine/Bonn (LAB) survey of galactic HI -: Final data release of the combined LDS and IAR surveys with improved stray-radiation corrections

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 440, Issue 2, Pages 775-782

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041864

Keywords

surveys; radio lines : ISM; Galaxy : structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the final data release of observations of lambda 21-cm emission from Galactic neutral hydrogen over the entire sky, merging the Leiden/Dwingeloo Survey ( LDS: Hartmann & Burton 1997, Atlas of Galactic Neutral Hydrogen) of the sky north of delta = -30 degrees with the Instituto Argentino de Radioastronom a Survey (IAR: Arnal et al. 2000, A&AS, 142, 35; and Bajaja et al. 2005, A& A, 440, 767) of the sky south of d = - 25.. The angular resolution of the combined material is HPBW similar to 0 degrees 6. The LSR velocity coverage spans the interval - 450 km s(-1) to + 400 km s-1, at a resolution of 1.3 km s-1. The data were corrected for stray radiation at the Institute for Radioastronomy of the University of Bonn, refining the original correction applied to the LDS. The rms brightness-temperature noise of the merged database is 0.07-0.09 K. Residual errors in the profile wings due to defects in the correction for stray radiation are for most of the data below a level of 20-40 mK. It would be necessary to construct a telescope with a main beam effeciency of eta(MB) greater than or similar to 99% to achieve the same accuracy. The merged and refined material entering the LAB Survey of Galactic H. is intended to be a general resource useful to a wide range of studies of the physical and structural characteristices of the Galactic interstellar environment. The LAB Survey is the most sensitive Milky Way H. survey to date, with the most extensive coverage both spatially and kinematically.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available