4.3 Article

MRI detection of early bone metastases in B16 mouse melanoma models

Journal

CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 403-411

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10585-005-1264-9

Keywords

animal models; bone metastases; magnetic resonance imaging; melanoma; rodents

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA097250-01A1, R01 CA97250, R24 CA 83060, P30 CA91842, R01 CA097250, P30 CA091842, R24 CA083060] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [5T3 HL0708828] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [T32 HD007499, T32 HD07499] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone metastasis causes significant morbidity in cancer patients, including bone pain, pathologic fractures, nerve compression syndrome, and hypercalcemia. Animal models are utilized to study the pathogenesis of skeletal metastases and to evaluate potential therapeutic agents. Previously published methods for imaging bone metastasis in rodent models have focused on identifying advanced stage metastasis using simple X-rays. Here we report MRI as a method for detecting early bone metastases in mouse models in vivo. B16 mouse melanoma cells were injected into the left cardiac ventricle of C57BL/6 mice and magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained of the left leg following the development of metastatic disease, when tumor associated bone destruction was histologically present but not visible by X-ray. T1 and T2 relaxation times of bone marrow were measured in healthy control mice and B16 melanoma tumor-bearing mice. Mean T2 values for normal marrow were 28 ms (SD 5) and for diseased bone marrow were 41 ms (SD 3). T2 relaxation time of diseased bone marrow is significantly longer than that of normal bone marrow (P<0.0001) and can be used as a marker of early bone metastases. These studies demonstrate that MR imaging can detect bone marrow metastases in small animals prior to development of cortical bone loss identified by X-ray.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available