4.4 Article

Rheagogies: Modelling non-trophic effects in food webs

Journal

ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 249-258

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.04.003

Keywords

interaction modifications; ecosystem engineers; community assembly; nutrient cycling

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a food web, nutrients flow via trophic links. For this reason, trophic interactions have a fundamental character due to the principle of mass conservation. To further comply with this principle, we consider a food web model that includes nutrient cycling. Non-trophic effects amongst species of the food web are modelled as interaction modifications, i.e., a functional change in the trophic interaction between two species caused by a third species (a three-party interaction that we call rheagogy). We also consider that the ecological communities modelled by the food webs result from an assembly process that involves colonisations and extinctions. We find that two distinct classes of ecological communities Must be distinguished: (a) super-efficient communities, in which almost all available nutrients are incorporated into the biomass and (b) sub-efficient ones, in which a large proportion of nutrients is not fixed by living organisms. We show that rheagogies (that model non-trophic interactions) are crucial: the larger the effects of rheagogies, the easier the construction of super-efficient communities. These communities are characterized by positive rheagogies, meaning that a certain proportion of mutualistic interactions is necessary. Systems with few or weak rheagogies are less likely to use available abiotic resources efficiently. Although richness (i.e., number of species) is also positively related to efficient nutrient use, its importance is much smaller than that of rheagogies. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available