4.3 Article

Size of the donor follicle, but not stage of reproductive cycle or seasonality, influences meiotic competency of selected domestic dog oocytes

Journal

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 113-119

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20330

Keywords

dog; oocyte; in vitro maturation; follicle; meiotic competence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ability of ovarian oocytes from the domestic dog to complete nuclear maturation in vitro (IVM) varies markedly among donors and generally is 20% or less of all oocytes cultured. To identify the cause(s) underlying these significant variations in meiotic maturation (to metaphase II; MII), we retrospectively analyzed data from 1,643 oocytes recovered from 90 bitches for which stage of reproduction and season of year were known. Neither stage of reproduction (proestrus/estrus, diestrus, anestrus, or prepuberty) nor season (P > 0.05) influenced the ability of oocytes to achieve nuclear maturation in vitro. A second study was conducted to examine the impact of follicular size on meiotic maturation. Populations of large oocytes were recovered from four categories of follicles (ranging from < 0.5 to > 2 mm in diameter) and cultured in TCM 199 for 48 hr. Follicular size influenced (P < 0.05) meiotic competence. Mean percentages of MII oocytes were 16.9 +/- 9.2, 26.1 +/- 7.6, 38.4 +/- 9.2, and 79.5 +/- 10.9 for oocytes recovered from < 0.5 mm, > 0.5-< 1 mm, 1-2 mm, and > 2 mm diameter follicles, respectively. In summary, stage of reproduction and season have no impact on the ability of dog oocytes to achieve nuclear maturation in vitro. However, we demonstrated for the first time that dog oocytes acquire meiotic competency during follicular development. IVM success of selected oocytes from large size follicles (almost 80%) is about 60% higher than measured in most previous studies involving randomly collected oocytes. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available