4.5 Article

Metabonomic identification of two distinct phenotypes in sprague-dawley (Crl:CD(SD)) rats

Journal

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 277-284

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi214

Keywords

metabonomics; phenotype; Sprague-Dawley (Crl : CD(SD)); hippuric acid; chlorogenic acid

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic drift in animal populations has been a recognized concern for many years. Less understood is the potential for phenotypic drift or variation that is not related to any genetic change. Recently, stock Sprague-Dawley (Crl:CD(SD)) rats obtained from the Charles River Raleigh facility demonstrated a distinct endogenous urinary metabonomic profile that differed from historical control SD urine spectral profiles obtained over the past several years in our laboratory. In follow-up studies, the origin of the variant phenotype was narrowed down to animals of both sexes that were housed in one specific room (Room 9) in the Raleigh facility. It is likely that the two phenotypes are related to distinct populations of gut flora that particularly impact the metabolism of aromatic molecules. The most pronounced difference between the two phenotypes is the relative amounts of hippuric acid versus other aromatic acid metabolites of chlorogenic acid. Though both molecular species are present in either phenotype, the marked variation in levels of these molecules between the two phenotypes has led to the designation of high hippuric acid (HIP) and high chlorogenic acid metabolites (CA) phenotypes. Specific urinary components that distinguish the phenotypes have been thoroughly characterized by NMR spectroscopy with additional, limited characterization by LC-MS (high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry). Co-habitation of rats from the two phenotypes rapidly facilitated a switch of the CA phenotype to the historical Sprague-Dawley phenotype (HIP). The impact of these variant phenotypes on drug metabolism and long-term safety assessment studies (e.g., carcinogenicity bioassays) is unknown.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available