4.5 Article

The nuclear receptors constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane X receptor cross-talk with hepatic nuclear factor 4α to synergistically activate the human CYP2C9 promoter

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Volume 314, Issue 3, Pages 1125-1133

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.087072

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CYP2C9 is an important human drug-metabolizing enzyme that is expressed primarily in liver. Recent studies in our laboratory have shown that the nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) is important in the transcriptional activation of the CYP2C9 promoter by drugs such as rifampicin and that the essential element is a constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)/PXR site -1839 bp upstream of the translation start site. Both CAR and PXR transcriptionally up-regulate the CYP2C9 promoter via these elements. In the present study, we ask whether additional sites in the proximal promoter also play a role in this induction. We identify two proximal hepatic nuclear factor (HNF) 4 alpha binding sites at -152 and -185 bp of the CYP2C9 promoter, both of which bind HNF4 alpha in gel shift assays and transcriptionally up-regulate this promoter in response to HNF4 alpha in HepG2 cells. HNF4 alpha synergizes with CAR and with PXR in HepG2 cells treated with rifampicin. The synergy only occurs when the CAR/PXR binding site at -1839 bp is present. Mutation of the two HNF4 alpha binding sites differentially prevented up-regulation of CYP2C9 promoter by both CAR as well as HNF4 alpha, synergy between the two receptors, and essentially abolished induction by rifampicin in HepG2 cells transfected with PXR. These studies strongly support the hypothesis that there is cross talk between distal CAR/PXR sites and HNF4 alpha binding sites in the CYP2C9 promoter and that the HNF4 alpha sites are required for maximal induction of the CYP2C9 promoter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available