4.7 Article

Can individualized rehabilitation improve functional independence in elderly patients with COPD?

Journal

CHEST
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages 1194-1200

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.3.1194

Keywords

COPD; COPM; daily activity; pulmonary rehabilitationx

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objectives: The aims of this study, were to establish whether pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves domestic function and daily activity, levels in COPD and whether individually targeted exercise is more effective than general exercise. Design: Prospective randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient PR program in secondary care. Participants: One-hundred eighty, patients (mean [+/- SD] age, 68.3 +/- 8.6 years; FEN1, 0.95 +/- 0.4 L; FEV1/FVC ratio, 0.51 +/- 0.15; 111 male patients; 69 female patients) with stable COPD. One hundred twenty-one patients completed the study. Interventions: patients were randomized to a conventional 7-week general exercise program ([GEP) n = 90) or an individually, targeted exercise program ([ITEP] n = 90). Measurement and results: Daily, activity was measured using ambulatory activity monitors (Z80 -32k V1 Int; Gaehwiler Electronics; Hombrechtikon, Switzerland). These were lightweight devices, which contained a uniaxial accelerometer. Domestic function was assessed by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Exercise performance was assessed by the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) and the endurance shuttle walk test and health status by the chronic respiratory questionnaire-self-reported. Activity. monitor counts increased by 29.18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.19 to 55.17; p = 0.03) for the GEP and 40.63% (95% CI, 7.42 to 73.83; p = 0.02) for the ITEP. Mean COPM performance scores increased by 1.71 (95% CI, 1.37 to 2.05; p = 0.0001) for the GEP and 1.46 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.87; p = 0.0001) for the ITEP. Mean COPM satisfaction scores increased by 2.27 (95% CI, 1.74 to 2.81; p = 0.0001) for the GEP and 2.04 (95% CI, 1.56 to 2.52; p = 0.0001) for the ITEP. ISWT scores increased by 81.72 m (range, 63.83 to 99.62) for the GEP and by 85.52 m (range, 67.62 to 10:3.42) for the ITEP. No statisticaliy significant difference was found between the general exercise group and the individually, targeted exercise group for any outcome measure. Conclusions: Pulmonary rehabilitation improves domestic function and Physical activity. This study, also demonstrates that general exercise training is as effective as individually targeted training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available