3.8 Article

Nonisothermal crystallization nucleation of in-situ fibrillar and spherical inclusions in poly (phenylene sulfide)/isotactic polypropylene blends

Journal

JOURNAL OF MACROMOLECULAR SCIENCE-PHYSICS
Volume B44, Issue 5, Pages 761-778

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00222340500251402

Keywords

PPS/iPP blend; microfibril; spherical particle; nonisothermal crystallization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonisothermal crystallization nucleation and its kinetics of in-situ fibrillar and spherical dispersed phases in poly (phenylene sulfide) (PPS)/isotactic polypropylene (iPP) blends are discussed. The PPS/iPP in-situ microfibrillar reinforced blend (MRB) was obtained via a slit-die extrusion, hot stretching, and quenching process, while PPS/iPP common blend with spherical PPS particles was prepared by extrusion without hot stretching. Morphological observation indicated that the well-defined PPS microfibrils were in situ generated. The diameter of most microfibrils was surprisingly larger than or equal to the spherical particles in the common blend (15185 PPS/iPP by weight). The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of three samples (microfibrillar, common blends, and neat iPP) were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The PPS microfibrils and spherical particles could both act as heterogeneous nucleating agents during the nonisothermal crystallization, thus increasing the onset and maximum crystallization temperature Of iPP, but the effect of PPS spherical particles was more evident. For the same material, crystallization peaks became wider and shifted to lower temperature when the cooling rate increased. Applying the theories proposed by Ozawa and Jeziorny to analyze the crystallization kinetics of neat iPP, and microfibrillar and common PPS/iPP blends, both of them could agree with the experimental results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available