4.6 Article

Genome-wide analyses demonstrate novel loci that predispose to drusen formation

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
Volume 46, Issue 9, Pages 3081-3088

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1360

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 03655] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [EY 015810, EY 10605, EY 13438, U10 EY 06594] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 28356] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE. To test whether genes for drusen formation are independent of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) pathogenesis. METHODS. A genome-wide model-free linkage analysis was performed, using two semiquantitative drusen traits, size and type, on two sets of data: ( 1) 325 individuals ( 225 sib pairs) from the Beaver Dam Eye Study (BDES), and ( 2) 297 individuals ( 346 sib pairs) from the Family Age Related Maculopathy Study ( FARMS). Apolipoprotein E ( APOE) genotypes were used as a covariate in a multipoint sibpair analysis. RESULTS. The authors found evidence of linkage on 19q13.31 (D19S245), with size of drusen in both the BDES ( P = 0.0287) and the FARMS ( P = 0.0013; P = 0.0005, combined). In the BDES, type showed linkage evidence on 3p24.3 (D3S1768; P = 0.0189) and 3q25.1 (D3S2404; P = 0.0141); the linkage on 3p24.3 was also found with size ( D3S1768; P = 0.0264). In the FARMS, size showed evidence of linkage at 5q33.3 (D5S820; P = 0.0021), 14q32.33 (D14S1007; P = 0.0013), and 16p13.13 (D16S2616; P = 0.0015) and type at 21q21.2 (D21S2052; P = 0.0070). For size in the FARMS, there was a small increase in P-value at marker D19S245 from 0.0044 to 0.0111, and from 0.0044 to 0.0064, when the epsilon 4-carrier and the epsilon 3-carrier genotype were the covariates, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. The results show that APOE effects may be mediated early in the progression of ARM to AMD and thus may not be detected by standard genome scans for more severe disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available