4.3 Article

Differential susceptibility to lethal endotoxaemia in mice deficient in IL-1α, IL-1β or IL-1 receptor type I

Journal

APMIS
Volume 118, Issue 12, Pages 1000-1007

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02684.x

Keywords

Interleukin-1; septic shock; endotoxaemia

Funding

  1. Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of intereukin-1 (IL-1) in mortality caused by endotoxaemia remains controversial. While IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) protects mice from lethal endotoxaemia, mice deficient in IL-1 beta (IL-1 beta- /-) display normal susceptibility to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The aim of this study was to identify the source of these discrepancies. Mice deficient in IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta or IL-1R type I were injected intraperitoneally with Escherichia coli or Salmonella typhimurium LPS. Survival of the mice was examined and compared with C57/Bl6 wild-type mice. In addition, serum cytokine concentrations were determined after LPS challenge and in vitro cytokine production by peritoneal macrophages was analysed. Clearance of radioactive IL-1 alpha was examined in IL-1 alpha-/- and wild-type mice. IL-1 beta-/- mice were normally susceptible to endotoxaemia and cytokine production did not differ from that in control mice. Surprisingly, LPS mortality in IL-1 alpha-/- mice was significantly greater than that in control mice, accompanied by higher interferon-gamma release. These effects were mediated by a distorted homeostasis of IL-1RI receptors, as shown by a strongly delayed clearance of IL-1 alpha. In contrast to the IL-1 alpha-/- and IL-1 beta-/- mice, IL-1RI-/- mice were completely resistant to high doses of LPS. In conclusion, IL-1RI-mediated signals are crucial in mediating mortality occurring as a result of lethal endotoxaemia. Investigation of IL-1-mediated pathways in IL-1 knock-out mice is complicated by a distorted homeostasis of IL-1Rs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available