4.7 Article

Biochemical and physiological mechanisms related to cold acclimation and enhanced freezing tolerance in poplar plantlets

Journal

PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages 82-94

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00554.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Temperature is one of the abiotic factors limiting growth and productivity of plants. In the present work, the effect of low non-freezing temperature, as inducer of 'cold acclimation', was studied in poplar. Actively growing plantlets of Populus tremula x Populus tremuloides cv. Muhs 1 were used, and cold treatment consisted in whole plants exposure to 4 degrees C in controlled conditions. Leaves of cold-treated poplars were shown to be acclimated, as an increase of their freezing tolerance was measured using electrolyte leakage. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements revealed a decrease in photosystem II efficiency while the pigment contents of leaves did not vary. In contrast, after 1 week of cold exposure, an accumulation of pigments was noted in the stems near the apex of the stressed plants as confirmed by chromatographic analyses. Simultaneously, a rapid accumulation of osmoprotectants, i.e. carbohydrates (measured by spectrometry), and of stress indicators (e.g. putrescine) occurred; changes in protein patterns also arose. Indeed, Western blot studies revealed that the expression of three families of stress-related proteins, i.e. dehydrins, stress protein 1 and heat-shock protein 70, was activated or induced by low temperatures. This study complements a previous work on proteomic and individual carbohydrates and provides insight in the ability of poplar plantlets to cold acclimate and to cope with low temperatures by diverse mechanisms (growth cessation, carbohydrate, pigment, polyamine and protein accumulations) related to stress response or involved in acclimation process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available