4.3 Article

Worries about modernity predict symptom complaints after environmental pesticide spraying

Journal

PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages 778-782

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000181277.48575.a4

Keywords

symptom reports; modem health worries; environmental concerns; anxiety; environmental incidents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Concerns about environmental and technological changes affecting health have been shown to be associated with symptom reports in cross-sectional studies. We aimed to investigate how worries about modernity affecting health, negative affectivity, and prior symptom complaints influence health complaints after environmental spraying in a prospective study. Methods: Two hundred ninety-two residents of West Auckland completed questionnaires measuring recent symptoms, negative affect, and concerns about the effects of modernity on health before aerial spraying of their neighborhood with Foray 48B. After spraying, 181 residents (62%) returned a follow-up questionnaire measuring symptoms, spray-avoidance behavior, and the perceived effect of the spray program on health. Results: The number of symptoms reported after the spray was most closely related to the number of symptoms reported at baseline (beta = 0.40, p =.0001). Higher levels of modem health worries (beta = 0.23, p = .001) and baseline symptoms (beta = 0.17, p < .05) were associated with a higher number of symptoms being attributed to the spray program. Modem health worries also predicted avoidance behavior during the spraying times (beta = 0.32, p = .001) and the belief that the health of participants and the health of their children and pets was affected by the spray (all p < .01). Conclusion: Worries about aspects of modem life affecting health can strongly influence the attribution of symptoms and beliefs about health effects after environmental incidents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available