4.7 Article

Genome-wide linkage analyses of type 2 diabetes in Mexican Americans -: The San Antonio Family Diabetes/Gallbladder Study

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 54, Issue 9, Pages 2655-2662

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.54.9.2655

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHGRI NIH HHS [N01-HG-65403] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [K01-DK-064867, R01-DK-042273, R01-DK-047482, R01-DK-53889] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [MH-59490] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The San Antonio Family Diabetes/Gallbladder Study was initiated to identify susceptibility genes for type 2 diabetes. Evidence was previously reported of linkage to diabetes on 10q with suggestive evidence on 3p and 9p in a genome-wide scan of 440 individuals from 27 pedigrees ascertained through a single diabetic proband. Subsequently, the study was expanded to include 906 individuals from 39 extended Mexican-American pedigrees, two additional examination cycles similar to 5.3 and 7.6 years after baseline, and genotypes for a new set of genome-wide markers. Therefore, we completed a second genome-wide linkage scan. Using information from a participant's most recent exam, the prevalence of diabetes in nonprobands was 21.8%. We performed genome-wide variance components-based genetic analysis on the discrete trait diabetes using a liability model and on the quantitative Martingale residual obtained from modeling age of diabetes diagnosis using Cox proportional hazard models. Controlling for age and age(2), our strongest evidence for linkage to the trait diabetes and the quantitative Martingale residual was on chromosome 3p at marker D3S2406 with multipoint empirical logarithm of odds scores of 1.87 and 3.76, respectively. In summary, we report evidence for linkage to diabetes on chromosome 3p in a region previously identified in at least three independent populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available