4.7 Article

Conservation of the E-function for floral organ identity in rice revealed by the analysis of tissue culture-induced loss-of-function mutants of the OsMADS1 gene

Journal

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 125-135

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11103-005-2161-y

Keywords

flower development; flower meristem; MADS-box; Oryza sativa L.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapid progress in studies on flower development has resulted in refining the classical 'ABC model' into a new 'ABCDE model' to explain properly the regulation of floral organ identity. Conservation of E-function for flower organ identity among the dicotyledonous (dicot) plants has been revealed. However, its conservation in monocotyledonous (monocot) plants remains largely unknown. Here, we show the conservation of E-function in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by characterizing tissue culture-induced mutants of two MADS-box genes, OsMADS1 and OsMADS5, which form a subclade within the well- supported clade of SEP-genes (E-function) phylogeny. Severe loss-of-function mutations of OsMADS1 cause complete homeotic conversion of organs (lodicules, stamens, and carpels) of three inner whorls into lemma- and palea-like structures. Such basic deformed structure is reiterated along with the pedicel at the center of the same floret, indicating the loss of determinacy of the flower meristem. These phenotypes resemble the phenotypes caused by mutations of the dicot E-class genes, such as the Arabidopsis SEP123(SEPALLATA1/2/3) and the petunia FBP2(Floral Binding Protein 2), suggesting that OsMADS1 play a very similar role in rice to that of defined E-class genes in dicot plants. In case of the loss-of-function mutation of OsMADS5, no defect in either panicles or vegetative organs was observed. These results demonstrate that OsMADS1 clearly possesses E-function, and so, E-function is fundamentally conserved between dicot plants and rice, a monocot model plant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available