4.6 Article

The pragmatic and ethical barriers to corporate social responsibility disclosure: The Nike Case

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 359-376

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-005-0869-x

Keywords

commercial speech; free speech; corporate; social responsibility; CSR reporting; Nike

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous studies have documented the demand for information regarding corporations' relationships to society. Much recent research has demonstrated why stakeholders need this information, and how it benefits both companies and the public. These studies suggest numerous methods by which companies can effectively disclose corporate social responsibility (CSR) information to the public, but in practice, reporting this type of information is fraught with legal and ethical uncertainty often unexplored in most literature. This article represents a fresh analysis of the numerous pragmatic consequences and legal and ethical complications inherent in CSR reporting, using Nike Corporation as a case example. The article discusses the theoretical viewpoints surrounding the ethics of CSR disclosure, and presents the case of Nike and the complications it encountered while advertising CSR information. The article ends, with an analysis of CSR auditing as a possible solution to companies seeking to improve the method and transparency of social responsibility reporting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available