Journal
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages 447-454Publisher
WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION
DOI: 10.2175/106143005X67359
Keywords
activated sludge; aeration efficiency; ceramic diffuser; membrane diffuser; offgas testing; oxygen transfer; capital costs; operation costs
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The aeration systems of two full-scale, activated-sludge basins were compared during a period of three years, under the same operating conditions, using dynamic off gas testing. Only the material of the diffuser was different (membrane versus ceramic-tube diffusers). The investigation has shown that, although the membrane diffusers have higher initial standard-oxygen-transfer efficiency (alpha SOTE) and standard-aeration efficiency (alpha SAE), these decreased over time, while the aSAE of the ceramic diffusers started lower, but increased slightly over the whole period. A cost comparison makes clear how important it is to evaluate the aeration system under process conditions. The operating costs were the dominant factor (similar to 10x higher than capital costs), and operating costs were approximately 20% higher for membrane versus ceramic diffusers. The poor performance of the membrane-tube diffusers under process conditions could be explained on the basis of the actual alpha AE values in the basin, not the standardized values.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available