Journal
JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 1246-1254Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.760
Keywords
electroporation; inducible gene expression; intramuscular injection; transfection; gene therapy; DNA vaccination
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background Application of electrical pulses after DNA injection into muscle increases expression of the encoded genes, and is shown to improve antigen-specific immune responses when used for DNA vaccination. In addition, electroporation causes tissue injury and inflammatory reactions. Together with immune stimulatory motifs in the injected DNA these factors may potentiate the immune response by acting as adjuvants for the antigen. Here, we have examined the role of these factors in promoting the efficiency of DNA vaccination. Methods We injected a plasmid DNA vector containing the gene Ag-85B from M. tuberculosis into mouse quadriceps muscles followed by electroporation. Ag-85B was under control of a Tet-responsive promoter, and was expressed either immediately or up to 28 days later by administrating doxycycline to the mice. Delayed expression was combined with injection of non-coding DNA or saline with or without electroporation to examine the ability of these factors to enhance the Ag85B-specific antibody response in the blood and cellular responses in the spleen. Blood samples were analysed with ELISA, while the number of Ag85B-specific IFN-gamma- and IL-4-producing spleenocytes was analysed with ELISpot. Results Delaying Ag85B expression by 5 or 28 days caused lower antiAg85B-specific IgG2a levels. In contrast, the IgG1 antibody response was not significantly affected. Injection of non-coding DNA followed by electroporation moderately increased the IgG2a response. Delaying the Ag-85B expression by 28 days reduced the average number of Ag85B-specific IFN-gamma-producing spleenocytes by over 60%. No significant change in the number of IL-4-producing Ag85B-specific spleenocytes was observed. Conclusions These results suggest that DNA and electroporation per se may act as good adjuvants in promoting efficient Th1-directed responses during DNA vaccination. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available