4.5 Article

Pocket protein complexes are recruited to distinct targets in quiescent and proliferating cells

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 18, Pages 8166-8178

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.25.18.8166-8178.2005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA077245, 2R01 CA77245-07] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [1F32 AG025617-01, F32 AG025617] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biochemical and genetic studies have determined that retinoblastoma protein (pRB) tumor suppressor family members have overlapping functions. However, these studies have largely failed to distinguish functional differences between the highly related p107 and p130 proteins. Moreover, most studies pertaining to the pRB family and its principal target, the E2F transcription factor, have focused on cells that have reinitiated a cell cycle from quiescence, although recent studies suggest that cycling cells exhibit layers of regulation distinct from mitogenically stimulated cells. Using genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation, we show that there are distinct classes of genes directly regulated by unique combinations of E2F4, p107, and p130, including a group of genes specifically regulated in cycling cells. These groups exhibit both distinct histone acetylation signatures and patterns of mammalian Sin3B corepressor recruitment. Our findings suggest that cell cycledependent repression results from recruitment of an unexpected array of diverse complexes and reveals specific differences between transcriptional regulation in cycling and quiescent cells. In addition, factor location analyses have, for the first time, allowed the identification of novel and specific targets of the highly related transcriptional regulators p107 and p130, suggesting new and distinct regulatory networks engaged by each protein in continuously cycling cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available