4.6 Article

18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of recurrent ovarian cancer:: a prospective study on forty-one patients

Journal

EJSO
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 792-797

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.02.029

Keywords

F-18-FDG PET/CT; conventional radiologic imaging; Ca125 serum levels; ovarian cancer; recurrent disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Many patients with ovarian cancer are at high risk of recurrence especially in the 2 years following first-line therapy. CA125 serum Levels measurement associated to computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are currently used during follow-up to detect recurrent disease. Unfortunately, in a relevant percentage of cases all of these traditional imaging techniques provide a significant number of doubtful/equivocal results or turn out negative even in presence of elevated Ca125 levels. Aim of our study was to evaluate sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of F-18-FDG PET/CT in a group of patients with suspicion of ovarian cancer recurrence. Methods: We prospectively evaluated 41 patients with a mean age of 59.4 years who had been previously treated for ovarian cancer with surgery and radio-chemotherapy or radio-chemotherapy alone. Following the performance of traditional radiologic imaging (US, CT, MRI) and Ca125 measurement, all patients underwent additional F-18-FDG PET/CT. PET/CT results were compared with histologic findings or clinical, laboratory and repeated traditional imaging techniques during subsequent follow-up data. Results: Of 41 patients 32 had a positive PET-CT (30 true positive, two false positive) whereas nine a negative PET/CT (five true negative, four false negative). Overall, in our experience F-18-FDG PET/CT provided a good sensitivity (88.2%), specificity (71.4%) and accuracy (85.4%), superior to that reported in literature for traditional radiologic imaging. Conclusions: It can be concluded that F-18-FDG PET/CT appears to be a useful. and accurate tool. in disclosing early recurrent ovarian cancer. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available