4.6 Article

Combining prenylation inhibitors causes synergistic cytotoxicity, apoptosis and disruption of RAS-to-MAP kinase signalling in multiple myeloma cells

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages 912-925

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05696.x

Keywords

farnesyltransferase inhibitors; geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitors; lovastatin; RAS signalling; multiple myeloma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The high incidence of activating RAS mutations, coupled with accumulating evidence linking RAS to multiple myeloma (MM) pathogenesis, indicate that novel therapies utilising inhibitors of RAS prenylation and signalling may be successful in the management of this disease. While preclinical studies investigating prenylation inhibitors, such as lovastatin, farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTI) and geranylgeranyltransferase inhibitors (GGTI), have been promising, recent phase I/II clinical trials with FTI R115777 were disappointing, suggesting resistance to FTI monotherapy. To address this issue, the effects of FTI, GGTI and lovastatin alone and in combination were analysed in MM cell lines and primary cells. FTI treatment blocked H-RAS processing, but was ineffective at inhibiting K- and N-RAS prenylation because of alternative geranylgeranylation of these isoforms. However, combinations of FTI and GGTI or lovastatin were found to synergistically inhibit MM cell proliferation, migration, K- and N-RAS processing, RAS-to-mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling and to induce apoptosis. In contrast to FTI, lovastatin and some GGTI were found to cause intracellular accumulation of Rho proteins. Our results suggest that clinical efficacy of prenylation inhibitors in MM are limited by alternative prenylation of several small G-proteins, such as RhoB, K- and N-RAS. Furthermore, strategies combining FTI with GGTI or statins may provide greater efficacy in MM treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available