4.4 Article

Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value

Journal

LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
Volume 390, Issue 5, Pages 413-420

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-005-0569-0

Keywords

peptic ulcer perforation; laparoscopy; treatment outcome; postoperative complications; risk factors

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aim: Clear patient selection criteria and indications for laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers are necessary. The aims of our study are to report the early outcome results after operation and to define the predictive values of risk factors influencing conversion rate and genesis of suture leakage. Patients/methods: Sixty nonrandomly selected patients operated on laparoscopically in a tertiary care academic center between October 1996 and May 2004 for perforated duodenal ulcers were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome measures included the duration of symptoms, shock, underlying medical illness, ulcer size, age, Boey score, and the collective predictive value of these variables for conversion and suture leakage rates. Results: Laparoscopic repair was completed in 46 patients (76.7%). Fourteen patients (23.3%) underwent conversion to open repair. Eight patients (13.3%) had postoperative complications. Suture leakage was confirmed in four patients (6.7%). Hospital stay was 7.8 +/- 5.3 days. There was no mortality. Patients with an ulcer perforation size of > 8 mm had a significantly increased risk for conversion to open repair (p < 0.05): positive predictive value (PPV) 75%, sensitivity 27%, specificity 98%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 85%. The significance of ulcer perforation size was confirmed by a stepwise logistic regression test (p=0.0201). All patients who developed suture leakage had acute symptoms for > 9 h preoperatively (p < 0.001): PPV 31%, specificity 84%, sensitivity 100%, and NPV 100%. Conversions happened with surgeons whose previous experience involved 1.8 +/- 2.3 cases compared to 3.9 +/- 2.9 cases in successful laparoscopic repair (p=0.039, t test). Conclusions: Ulcer perforation size of > 8 mm is a significant risk factor influencing the conversion rate. An increase in the suture leakage rate is predicted by delayed presentation of > 9 h.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available