4.7 Article

Postmitotic nuclear retention of episomal plasmids is altered by DNA labeling and detection methods

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 460-467

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.05.001

Keywords

gene therapy; transfection; microinjection; plasmids; episomes; mitosis; peptide nucleic acid; fluorophores; nuclear import

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY07128-05, T32 EY007128] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL071643-020005, R01 HL059956, R01 HL059956-07, HL71643, P01 HL071643, HL59956] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One often overlooked aspect of nonviral gene therapy is the maintenance and localization of plasmids within a transfected cell. In this study we have quantified the nuclear retention of plasmids within microinjected cells after a single round of cell division. We employed several commercially available reagents to label plasmids with fluorophores for our microinjection tracking experiments. Interestingly, plasmids labeled with different techniques produced drastically different results. Naked plasmids microinjected directly into nuclei and later detected by in situ hybridization were found almost exclusively within the nuclei of the daughter cells after mitosis and were partitioned between the daughter nuclei with a normal, Gaussian distribution. Identical results were obtained with plasmids labeled with a fluorescent peptide nucleic acid. However, when plasmids were labeled with several commercially available fluorescent DNA labeling kits that randomly attach fluorophores to the entire plasmid and injected into HeLa cell nuclei, the modified plasmids were excluded from daughter nuclei after cell division. Taken together, these results suggest that naked, unmodified plasmids are retained in the nucleus following cell division and likely continue to express in the daughter cells. Our results demonstrate the significant alterations in episome localization that the labeling technique itself can have on plasmid trafficking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available