4.5 Article

Polyphasic study of Chryseobacterium strains isolated from diseased aquatic animals

Journal

SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 7, Pages 640-660

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.03.016

Keywords

Chryseobacterium; Elizabethkingia; fish disease; frog disease; polyphasic taxonomy; phenotypic characteristics; randomly amplified polymorphic DNA; whole-cell protein profiles; SDS-PAGE; fatty acid analysis; 16S rRNA gene sequence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Members of most Chryseottacterium species occur in aquatic environments or food products, while strains of some other species are pathogenic to humans and animals. A collection of 52 Chryseobacterium sp. strains isolated from diseased fish, one frog isolate and 22 reference strains were included in a polyphasic taxonomy study. Fourteen clusters of strains were delineated following the comparison of whole-cell protein profiles. Most of these clusters were confirmed when the phenotypic and RAPD profiles and the 16S rRNA gene sequences were compared. Fatty acid composition helped differentiate the Chryseobacterium strains from members of related genera. None of the fish isolates could be allocated to the two species previously reported from fish but two isolates belonged to C. joostei, while the frog isolate was identified as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica, a human pathogen previously included in the genus Chryseobacterium. Three clusters grouping from 3 to 13 isolates will probably constitute the core of new Chryseobacterium species but all other isolates occupied separate or uncertain positions in the genus. This study further demonstrated the overall high similarity displayed by most Chryseottacterium strains whatever the technique used and the resulting difficulty in delineating new species in the genus. Members of this bacterial group should be considered potential emergent pathogens in various fish and frog species, farming conditions and geographical areas. (c) 2005 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available