4.3 Review

Preoperative radiation and free flap outcomes for head and neck reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages 121-127

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ans.12888

Keywords

free flap surgery; head and neck neoplasm; microsurgery; neoadjuvant therapy; radiotherapy; tissue transfer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThere is a general consensus among reconstructive surgeons that preoperative radiotherapy is associated with a higher risk of flap failure and complications in head and neck surgery. Opinion is also divided regarding the effects of radiation dose on free flap outcomes and timing of preoperative radiation to minimize adverse outcomes. Our meta-analysis will attempt to address these issues. MethodA systematic review of the literature was conducted in concordance to PRISMA protocol. Data were combined using STATA 12 and Open Meta-Analyst software programmes. ResultsTwenty-four studies were included comparing 2842 flaps performed in irradiated fields and 3491 flaps performed in non-irradiated fields. Meta-analysis yielded statistically significant risk ratios for flap failure (RR 1.48, P = 0.004), complications (RR 1.84, P < 0.001), reoperation (RR 2.06, P < 0.001) and fistula (RR 2.05, P < 0.001). Mean radiation dose demonstrated a trend towards increased risk of flap failure, but this was not statistically significant. On subgroup analysis, flaps with >60Gy radiation had a non-statistically significant higher risk of flap failure (RR 1.61, P = 0.145). ConclusionPreoperative radiation is associated with a statistically significant increased risk of flap complications, failure and fistula. Preoperative radiation in excess of 60Gy after radiotherapy represents a potential risk factor for increased flap loss and should be avoided where possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available