4.6 Article

Three-dimensional structure-from-motion selectivity in the anterior superior temporal polysensory area, STPa, of the behaving monkey

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 1299-1307

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi013

Keywords

monkey; optic flow; single-unit recording; structure-from-motion; temporal cortex; visual pathways

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [NCRR IS10RR12873, S10 RR012873-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NEI NIH HHS [NEI EY09223, R01 EY009223, R01 EY009223-05A2, R01 EY009223-07, R01 EY009223-08, R01 EY009223-06] Funding Source: Medline
  3. ONR [ONR N00014-93-1-0334] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human and non-human primates are able to perceive three-dimensional structure from motion displays. Three-dimensional structure-from-motion (object-motion) displays were used to test the hypothesis that neurons in the anterior division of the superior temporal polysensory area (STPa) of monkeys can selectively respond to three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Monkeys performed a reaction time task that required the detection of a change in the fraction of structure in three-dimensional transparent sphere displays. Neurons were able to distinguish structured and unstructured three-dimensional optic flow. These cells could differentiate the change in structure-from-motion at stimulus presentation and when the animal was detecting the amount of structure in the display. Some of these neurons were also tuned for characteristics of the sphere stimuli. Cells were also tested with navigational motion and many were found to respond both to three-dimensional structure-from-motion and navigational motion. These results suggest that STPa neurons represent specific aspects of three-dimensional surface structure and that neurons within STPa contribute to the perception of three-dimensional structure-from-motion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available