4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Quality analysis of in vivo near-infrared fluorescence and conventional gamma images acquired using a dual-labeled tumor-targeting probe -: art. no. 054010

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.2114748

Keywords

fluorescence-enhanced optical imaging; continuous wave; photon migration; contrast agent; molecular imaging of cancer

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB00174, R01 EB003132] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cyclic peptide, cyclopentapeptide cyclo(lys-Arg-GlyAsp-phe) (c(KRGDf)), which is known to target alpha v beta 3 integrin, is dual-labeled with a radiotracer, (111)indium, for gamma scintigraphy as well as with a near-infrared dye, IRDye800, for continuous-wave (cw) imaging of av beta 3 positive human M21 melanoma in xenografts. Twentyfour hours after administration of the dual-labeled peptide at a dose equivalent to 90 mu Ci of In-111 and 5 nmol of near-infrared (NIR) dye, whole-body gamma scintigraphy and cw imaging was conducted. image acquisition time was 15 min for the gamma scintigraphy images and 800 ms for the.,optical images acquired using an NIR sensitive intensified charge-coupled device. The results show that while the target-to-background ratio (TBR) of nuclear and optical imaging were similar for surface regions of interest and consistent with the origin of. gamma and NIR radiation from a common targeted peptide, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was significantly higher for optical than nuclear imaging. Furthermore, an analysis of SNR versus contrast showed greater sensitivity of optical over nuclear imaging for the subcutaneous tumor targets. While tomographic reconstructions are necessary to probe TBR, SNR, and contrast for interior tissues, this work demonstrates for the first time the direct comparison of molecular optical and planar nuclear imaging for surface and subsurface cancers. (c) 2005 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available