4.4 Article

Dynamics of neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult rats

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 385, Issue 1, Pages 70-75

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.05.022

Keywords

adult neurogenesis; hippocampus; aging; proliferation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hippocampal neurogenesis declines steadily over the first year of life in the rodent, but the process persists into senescence despite a dramatic drop in the number of neurons it produces. At this point though, the survival and development patterns exhibited by new granule cells in the aging brain remain unclear in relation to patterns observed in the younger brain. The present study was carried out in order to obtain a direct quantitative comparison of hippocampal neurogenesis in juvenile and middle-aged rats with a high degree of temporal resolution, and to compare the survival and differentiation of the new cells over time. Thirty-eight-day-old and 12-month-old, male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) in order to label cells dividing in the dentate gyrus over a 24-h period, and immunohistochemical labeling was performed in order to record cell production and survival at eight different time points over the following two-month period. Using a marker of neuronally committed precursors and immature neurons (doublecortin; DCX), as well as a marker of mature neurons (calbindin d-28 K; CaBP), the extent and timeline of neuronal differentiation, maturation, and migration of the new cells were also characterized. Results indicated that 12-month-old rats experienced a nearly 94% reduction in neurogenesis relative to juveniles, due almost entirely to a 92% drop in cell production. A largely preserved course of development and migration in the remaining newborn cells suggests treatments that enhance cell proliferation could be crucial in reversing the age-related decline in neurogenesis. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available