4.7 Article

Impact of atrial fibrillation on the diagnostic performance of B-type natriuretic peptide concentration in dyspneic patients - An analysis from The Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 838-844

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.057

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to assess the diagnostic performance of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in the diagnosis of acute congestive heart failure (CHF) in patients with permanent/paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) presenting with acute dyspnea. BACKGROUND It is unknown to what extent AF affects the diagnostic performance of BNP in patients presenting with acute dyspnea. METHODS We studied 1,431 patients drawn from a cohort of patients (n = 1,586) with acute dyspnea who had BNP levels measured on arrival. Patients were prospectively classified according to the presence or absence of permanent/paroxysmal AF. RESULTS In total, 292 patients had permanent/paroxysmal AF. In patients without HF, permanent/paroxysmal AF was associated with significantly higher BNP levels (p = 0.001). Conversely, in patients with HF, BNP levels did not differ significantly between patients with and without AF (p = 0.533). A BNP cutoff value of 100 pg/ml had a specificity of 40% and 79% for the diagnosis of acute HF in patients with and without AF, respectively. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.89) and 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.89 to 0.93) for patients with and without AF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients without, but not in those with HF, the presence of AF is associated with higher circulating BNP levels, suggesting that a higher diagnostic threshold should be used in patients with AF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available