4.7 Article

Marker-based estimation of heritability for body color variation in Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 249, Issue 1-4, Pages 95-105

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.03.023

Keywords

heritability; relatedness; microsatellite; albino; quantitative trait; Japanese flounder; Paralichthys olivaceus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Albinos of Japanese flounder were found in a hatchery population. Their body color was not uniform and a large variation was observed. To examine genetic effects on the albinism and the color variation, this study estimated relatedness among albinos and wild-type individuals and heritability of body color among albinos using marker-based approaches. Significant differences between albinos and wild-type individuals were observed in all color components of red, green, blue, hue, saturation and intensity with large variations within each group. The number of alleles per locus at seven microsatellite loci was significantly lower in the albinos than in the wild-type individuals. The dendrogram of relatedness estimated from microsatellites indicated that most albinos tended to be closely related to each other. The genetic data suggested that the albinos were produced by some, but not one or many, pairs. Marker-based estimates of heritability among all individuals were significantly greater than zero for all color components with estimates of 0.77-0.98. In addition, significantly positive heritability was observed for red, green and intensity in the albinos. These results indicated that the albinism detected in a hatchery population of Japanese flounder might be strongly heritable as observed in other fish species. Furthermore, estimates of heritability suggested that the color variation observed among the albinos was partly caused by additive genetic effects. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available