4.7 Article

Ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens activation to smoking-related pictorial cues in smokers and nonsmokers:: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 488-494

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.028

Keywords

nucleus accumbens; smoking; nicotine; tobacco; cue reactivity; fMRI

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [1 K08 DA14276-01A2, K08 DA014276] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Converging evidence from several theories of the development of incentive-sensitization to smoking-related environmental stimuli suggests that the ventral striatum plays an important role in the processing of smoking-related cue reactivity. Methods: Twenty-six healthy right-handed volunteers (14 smokers and 12 nonsmoking controls) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which neutral and smoking-related images were presented. Region of interest analyses were performed within the ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens (VS/NAc)for the contrast between smoking-related (SR) and nonsmoking related neutral (N) cues. Results. Group activation for SR versus N cues was observed in smokers but not in nonsmokers in medial orbitofrontal cortex, superior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and posterior fusiform gyrus using whole-brain corrected Z thresholds and in the ventral VS/NAc using uncorrected Z-statistics (smokers Z = 3.2). Region of interest analysis of signal change within ventral VS/NAc demonstrated significantly greater activation to SR versus N cues in smokers than controls. Conclusions: This is the first demonstration of greater VS/NAc activation in addicted smokers than nonsmokers presented with smoking-related cues using fMRI. Smokers, but not controls, demonstrated activation to SR versus N cues in a distributed reward signaling network consistent with cite reactivity studies of other drugs of abuse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available